“The only way to fix the death penalty is to abolish it,” said Steidl. “All murders are heinous but I don’t believe that anyone has the right to take anyone’s life, there is no closure for the death regardless.”
We,
the comrades of Unit 1012, want to make ONE THING CLEAR. We understand that
Randy Steidl was truly innocent of the crime and we hate wrongful convictions. We
are glad and happy that he was not wrongfully executed or wrongfully imprisoned
anymore. We can accept the fact that he wants to oppose the death penalty and
we can respect that.
 |
|
Satan wants to breed
murderers
|
"It diminishes the victims when people burn candles and mourn someone who has committed a heinous crime. People on death row are some of the worst individuals that appear on the face of the earth. The abolitionists refuse to acknowledge that evil exists and evil has to be put down."- Marc Klaas, father of Polly Klaas
However,
what we cannot accept is that we disagree with him wanting to abolish the death
penalty, he is going to hurt the feelings of those murdered victims’ families like us who want justice and also put his citizens at risk of getting killed by
recidivist murderers (by letting murderers keep their lives).
“The ends cannot justify the means when the means are fraudulent.”
Speaking
of innocent people convicted, while there are truly innocent people, we DO KNOW
WELL about the innocence fraud, which people
like him refuse to tell the public. The fact that if anybody know about the Anthony Porter and Alstory Simon Case, which happen in Illinois
is even enough for us to mistrust the ACLU Demons.
 |
|
Free: Alstory Simon confessed to a double
murder in 1999, mainly because of an investigation from a team of students at
Northwestern University. He was released from Jacksonville Correctional
Facility last week
|
These
two exonerated men prove to be all along a real innocence fraud. First, Joseph Green Brown, who on September 14, 2012, is
now suspected of murdering his wife.
 |
|
Joseph Green Brown
|
Second, Delbert Tibbs
who was only released because his death sentence was overturned because:
10. Delbert Tibbs--Tibbs v. State, 337 So.2d 788 (Fla. 1976) (Tibbs I); State v. Tibbs, 370 So.2d 386 (Fla.App. 1979) (Tibbs II); Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120, 1123 (Fla. 1981) (Tibbs III); Tibbs v. Florida, 457 U.S. 31 (1982) (Tibbs IV). Tibbs was convicted of raping a woman and murdering her boyfriend. The chief witness was the surviving rape victim who identified Tibbs as her boyfriend’s murderer.Tibbs' conviction was reversed by a 4-3 vote of the Florida Supreme Court. The majority applied an anachronistic review standard that "carefully scrutinized" the testimony of the prosecutrix since she was the sole witness in the rape case "so as to avoid an unmerited conviction." Tibbs I at 790. The conviction was not even reversed because the Florida court found the evidence legally insufficient, but merely because the Florida court found the “weight” of the evidence was insubstantial. The court found the prosecutor's testimony to be doubtful when compared with the lack of evidence (other than her eyewitness testimony) that Tibbs was in the area where the rape-murder occurred. Id. at 791.Subsequently, in a later opinion, the Florida Supreme Court repudiated this "somewhat more subjective" rule that permitted an appellate court to reverse a conviction because of the weight of the evidence, rather than its sufficiency. In hindsight, the Florida Supreme Court candidly conceded that it should not have reversed Tibbs' conviction since the evidence was legally sufficient. Tibbs III at 1126. The old review standard applied to Tibbs’ original case was a throwback to the long discarded rule that a rape conviction required corroboration of the rape victim's testimony–an unenlightened rule which inherently distrusted the testimony of the rape victim. Id. at 1129 fn. 3 (Sundberg, C.J. dis. & conc.); see e.g. People v. Rincon-Pineda, 14 Cal.3d 864 (Cal. 1975). The reversal of Tibbs’ conviction was a windfall for Tibbs, not a finding of innocence.Subsequently, a debate in the Florida courts as to whether or not Tibbs could be retried under the Double Jeopardy Clause made its way to the United States Supreme Court. Justice O'Connor's opinion explained that the rape victim gave a detailed description of her assailant and his truck. Tibbs was stopped because he matched her description of the murderer. The victim had already viewed photos of several single suspects on three or four occasions and had not identified them. She examined several books of photos without identifying any suspects. However, when she saw Tibbs' photo, she did identify Tibbs as the rapist-murderer. She again identified Tibbs in a lineup and positively identified him at trial. Tibbs IV at 33 & fn. 2. At trial, the victim admitted drug use and that she used drugs "shortly" before the crimes occurred. She was confused as to the time of day that she first met Tibbs. Although not admitted as evidence, polygraphs showed however that the victim was truthful. Tibbs denied being in the area during the time of the offense and his testimony was partially corroborated. However, the prosecution introduced a card with Tibbs' signature which contradicted his testimony as to his location. Tibbs disputed that he had signed the card. Id. at 34-35.O’Connor’s opinion also noted the evidence that the Florida Supreme Court had originally believed weakened the prosecution’s case. However, since the evidence of guilt was not legally insufficient, the Double Jeopardy Clause did not bar Tibbs’ retrial. Id. at 35.Ultimately, due to the current status of the surviving victim--a lifelong drug addict--the original prosecutor concluded the evidence was too tainted for retrial. In Spite of Innocence, at 59. Nonetheless, the evidence recounted in the United States Supreme Court decision hardly supports a claim that Tibbs is actually innocent.The state prosecutor who chose not to retry Tibbs recently explained to the Florida Commission on Capital Crimes that Tibbs “was never an innocent man wrongfully accused. He was a lucky human being. He was guilty, he was lucky and now he is free.”
 |
|
Death penalty supporters protest at the port
of Nusakambangan ahead of the execution of Bali Nine Kingpins Andrew Chan and
Myuran Sukumaran
[PHOTO SOURCE: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-1165092/Death-penalty-supporters-protest-execution-island-port.html]
|
In
conclusion, Randy Steidl, while we DO NOT want a truly innocent man to be
convicted, we know how the ACLU Demons lie and lie. We have this message from
the late, Lech Aleksander Kaczyński to people like you:
 |
Lech Aleksander
Kaczyński
|
No comments:
Post a Comment