After learning about
the Anthony Porter Case, We, the comrades of Unit 1012, NEVER and DO NOT
support any wrongful conviction, we want the guilty to be punished. However, we
know that the ACLU Demons, uses the word, ‘innocent convicted’
not because they fear convicting the innocent, but they just oppose convicting
the guilty.
On this date, October
30, 2014, Alstory Simon was freed from Prison after
spending nearly 15 years behind bar after being framed by the Innocence
Project. We encourage the public to never believe in those Anti-Death Penalty
Activists (Pro Murderers and murder victims haters) send by Satan anymore, as
they enjoy LYING AND LYING SO MUCH!
In loving memory of
Laci Peterson, we will post this article to expose the lies that Scott Peterson
was innocent of his crimes.
Scott Peterson Prosecutors Reveal
‘Overwhelming Evidence’ From Murder Trial
New
file claims 'lies' he told to cover up horrific murder of Laci & their
baby.
Posted on
Scott
Peterson does not deserve a new trial after “overwhelming
evidence,” convicted him of the callous murder of his pregnant wife, Laci Peterson, and their unborn child, bombshell new court documents in the case
claim.
Peterson, now
44, is on Death Row in California after a 2004 jury found him guilty of killing
his 27-year-old wife when she was eight months pregnant with the son they
planned to name Connor. She disappeared on Christmas Eve and her body, and the
baby’s, washed ashore in the San Francisco Bay four months later.
Peterson has
filed an appeal claiming that his attorney did not call multiple witnesses that claimed to
have seen Laci after authorities say she disappeared, and that cops did not
investigate a robbery on the Petersons’ street, which he believes could have
been connected to his wife’s murder.
A new A&E
documentary from Peterson’s side of the case claimed that 11 witnesses had seen
Laci later in the evening on the night she supposedly vanished, casting doubt
on the theory of when Scott killed her.
The State Attorney General filed their response to Scott’s appeal
on August 11, 2017, noting that there had been “overwhelming evidence,” to
convict him, and that his attorney, Mark Geragos, did not botch the
case.
The court
papers detailed Scott’s suspicious behavior surrounding the murder, including “his expressed wanderlust and desire to be responsibility-free,
which he conveyed to his mistress as the birth of his son neared; buying a boat
mere weeks before Laci’s disappearance; ‘fishing’ with the wrong gear on
Christmas Eve morning in inclement weather; surreptitious trips to the marina
in various rented vehicles after Laci’s disappearance; lies to friends and
family concerning his whereabouts,” according to the Modesto Bee.
The documents
reiterated the evidence that was presented in court, which jurors weighed when
they convicted Scott of the murder of his wife and unborn child.
Such evidence
included: “the sale of Laci’s car and inquiry into selling their home,
including furnishings; subscribing to pornography channels while the search was
ongoing; Laci’s and Conner’s bodies washing ashore not far from (Scott)
Peterson’s location on the bay; condition of the bodies correlat(ing) with the
timing of Laci’s disappearance; and (Scott) Peterson’s disguised appearance and
possession of survival gear and copious amounts of cash at the time of his
arrest.”
During his
opening statements, Geragos told jurors that he would present witnesses who
would say they say Laci in the neighborhood after Scott left to go fishing.
Those witnesses never testified, and neither did the robbers who took a safe
from a home across the street from the Petersons. (They robbed that home on
December 26, not on the 24th, when Laci disappeared.)
“Purported
sightings of Laci were legion,” Supervising Deputy Attorney General Donna
Provenzano wrote in the documents, according to the Modesto Bee. Provenzano
noted there were 74 reported sightings in 26 states, and even reported
sightings of Laci overseas. She noted, “Most were not viable and none were
corroborated.”
None of those
witnesses testified, the document said, because the neighborhood witnesses were
not believable and because the burglary likely happened on Dec. 26, not the
morning of Dec. 24, when Laci vanished as Scott left to fish.
Another line
of Scott’s defense was regarding evidence that suggests that a tracking dog found Laci’s scent at the Berkeley Marina four
days after her husband launched the boat that would have contained her
body, before he dumped it in the water.
The State
argued that a dog had tracked Laci’s scent from her home to Scott’s warehouse,
where he kept the boat, and then down the highway heading to the Bay area, but
that evidence was not allowed into trial. They said that the dog evidence that
was allowed into trial was not even as significant as that which was allowed.
“The excluded
testimony was far more damaging to Peterson’s defense,” Provenzano wrote in the
documents, explaining why Geragos may not have fought the dog evidence.
Scott’s
attorneys can file a response to the State’s filing and then the California
Supreme Court may schedule oral arguments in the case.
INTERNET
SOURCE: https://radaronline.com/celebrity-news/scott-peterson-murder-laci-peterson-appeal-documents-tv-show-court/
No comments:
Post a Comment