The World Day Against
the Death Penalty is held every year on October 10. However, We, the comrades
of Unit 1012: The VFFDP will remember 8 year old Huang Na who died on this date, 10
October 2004. We rather remember murdered children then listen to abolitionists
who show sympathy for murderers. The Killer, Took Leng How was executed by hanging in
Singapore on 3 November 2006.
We will make her one of The 82 murdered children of Unit 1012,
where we will not forget her.
 |
|
Huang Na, a China-born student living in
Singapore who was found to have been murdered by a man named Took Leng How.
|
INTERNET
SOURCE: http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/guilty-as-charged-huang-na-8-killed-by-man-she-treated-as-an-uncle
Guilty As
Charged: Huang Na, 8, killed by man she treated as an uncle
 |
|
Huang Na's parents had
to be supported at the Mandai Crematorium as they watched their daughter's
coffin roll into the furnace. The Primary 2 student was killed in a storeroom
at the Pasir Panjang Wholesale Centre. PHOTO:
ST FILE
|
Published
May 17, 2016, 5:16 am SGT
When the girl
went missing, Singaporeans from all walks of life helped in the search. But she
was already dead — killed by a man she treated as an uncle
This story was first published in July
2015 in an e-book titled Guilty As Charged: 25 Crimes That Have Shaken
Singapore Since 1965. A collaboration between The Straits Times and the
Singapore Police Force, the e-book appeared in The Straits Times Star E-books
app. Read the other crime stories here. (Warning: Some content
in these stories may be disturbing for some individuals.)
Huang Na's
murder (2004)
When the eight-year-old went missing,
Singaporeans from all walks of life helped in the search. But she was
already dead — killed by a man she treated as an uncle
Like any other study mama from China,
Huang Na’s mother brought her to Singapore in early 2003 for a better
education. The girl’s dream was to be a doctor so she could in turn give her
mother a better life. Huang Na also learnt to be streetsmart and independent,
as her mother had to shuttle between Singapore and Fujian to care for her
11-month-old half-sister.
On Sept 27, 2004, a day before Huang
Na’s eighth birthday, her mother returned to their hometown for two
weeks.
Huang Na, who once even took a flight
back to China alone, was left in the care of friends, who lived with her and
her mother in a small room on the upper floor of a fruit and vegetable company
at the Pasir Panjang Wholesale Centre.
The bubbly girl would go to school
herself, take her meals at a nearby food court and sometimes even cook for her
and her neighbours. She showered in a common toilet. The centre’s auction hall
was her playground.
 |
|
Took Leng How was hanged for the murder of 8
year old Huang Na.
[PHOTO SOURCE: http://www.ycwb.com/xkb/2006-11/05/content_1269201.htm]
|
On the afternoon of Oct 10, Huang Na
called her mother from a phone booth and asked her to buy a computerised
English dictionary and a pair of sandals. They spoke for about six minutes.
That was the last time Madam Huang
Shuying heard her voice. And it was the last day Huang Na was seen alive —
barefooted and wearing a blue denim jacket and bermudas.
On Oct 31, her badly-decomposed body
was found stuffed inside a brown cardboard box less than half her size.
The box was found in dense undergrowth
at Telok Blangah Hill Park, just hours after Penang-born Took Leng How was
grilled by police.
The vegetable packer, who worked at
the wholesale centre and had previously shared a flat with Huang Na and her
mother, admitted to strangling the girl with his bare hands in a storeroom
where he had lured her for a game of hide-and-seek.
The news left a nation shocked.
 |
|
Madam Huang Shuying combed Singapore in
taxis, armed with a mobile phone and photos of her missing eight-year-old
daughter. PHOTO: WANBAO FILE
|
Nationwide
search
Huang Na’s disappearance was first
made public in newspapers on Oct 14, four days after she was last seen at
around 1pm at the food court less than 500m from her home. The Primary 2 pupil
of Jin Tai Primary School was described as 1.2m tall, with a fair-complexion
and straight dark hair.
Police urged anyone with information
to come forward.
Coffeeshop assistant C.B. Lim, who described
her as a familiar figure, was one of the last to see her alive. “As she passed
by, I asked her why she had no slippers and she just smiled and went.”
Madam Huang, who had returned to
Singapore two days after the disappearance, combed the island for her girl,
even searching construction sites and ditches.
She showed photographs of Huang Na to
strangers, asking if they had seen her. She also scoured Bukit Timah Hill and
Mount Faber after her niece dreamt she was being held on a mountain.
 |
|
Madam Huang Shuying went to Bukit Timah Hill
to look for her daughter after being told by her niece that she had dreamt
Huang Na was being held on a mountain. PHOTO: SHIN MIN FILE
|
“I looked everywhere, from Clementi to
Geylang, from Race Course Road to Woodlands. I’ve tried them all, but there is
no news,” she said.
She could not imagine why anyone would
want to harm her daughter. “I work here to earn money for my daughter to
study,” said Madam Huang, who worked at a vegetable stall at the wholesale
centre. “We lead a simple life. I didn’t make any enemies or offend anyone.”
Police searched Huang Na’s favourite
haunts, including West Coast Park and the IMM building. Hospitals and transport
companies were roped in to keep a lookout for her.
A 60-year-old retired businessman
offered a $10,000 reward to anyone with information. Another Singaporean added
another $5,000.
Mr Joseph Tan, the founder of Crime
Library, a voluntary group which looks for missing people, and employees of his
recycling company handed out leaflets to passers-by near where Huang Na
disappeared. The general manager of an online design company set up a website
to gather tip-offs.
Taxi company ComfortDelGro asked its cabbies
to join in the search effort.
In Malaysia, 30 cabbies placed posters
of Huang Na on the rear windscreens and front seats of their vehicles. At least
five coffee-shop owners in Johor Jaya, Taman Yew and Skudai put up posters.
 |
|
Even cabbies in Malaysia joined the search
for Huang Na. They displayed posters of the girl and distributed flyers to
their customers. PHOTO: ST FILE
|
Those who tried to help Madam Huang
said it was heart-wrenching to watch news clips of the mother clutching her
daughter’s toys, clothes and pictures, walking through neighbourhoods with
tears in her eyes, calling out her name.
 |
|
THE VICTIM: Huang Na's ashes in the
shrine at a Taoist temple at Yan Kit Road, in Tanjong Pagar. PHOTO: ST FILE
|
SUSPICIOUS
BEHAVIOUR
On Oct 21, police released a picture
of Took and asked for information on his whereabouts.
The Malaysian, who was 22 then, had
disappeared after police twice interviewed him in connection to Huang Na’s
disappearance and he agreed to take a polygraph test. He had claimed to police
that he had seen four gang members abduct the girl. Despite having surrendered
his passport, he was able to sneak into Malaysia.
Those who worked at the wholesale
centre said Took and Huang Na were close, and that he would give her rides on a
motorcycle. He was also one of the last people seen with her.
But Madam Huang did not believe Took,
whom her daughter called “shu shu” (uncle), could be involved in anything
sinister.
“I don’t believe he’s the one who took
my daughter. He has no reason to — we’re just acquaintances,” she told the
media. “He was very fond of her. He always bought things for her to eat, but
never took her outside of the market. I know he would never hurt her.”
Took’s 52-year-old father in Penang,
who sold fried kway teow at the family’s coffee shop, told the Malaysian press
that his son, the second of four siblings, had phoned him and said that he had
not kidnapped the girl.
He only ran from Singapore because he
felt pressured by the police, the father added.
Took’s Indonesian wife You Li, who was
living with his father, also revealed that he had called her to say that he was
in Johor, and that someone else had taken Huang Na.
He claimed that the last time he saw
the girl, he gave her two mangoes and sent her on her way. Took’s brother
described his older sibling as a “timid” man, who did not have the courage to
borrow money or get into fights – let alone kidnap a child.
Nine days after being on the run, Took
surrendered to police in Penang and was brought back to Singapore on Oct
30.
He claimed that he secretly entered
Malaysia because he wanted to see his 14-month-old son but failed to do so. The
past nine days were “hell”, he insisted. “How good can it be, hiding here and
there?”
In the interview he gave to the
Malaysian press, he also claimed that he sympathised with Madam Huang. “I want
to tell her, I also love Huang Na because I have a child myself. I hope that
people won’t make wild allegations about me, because the truth can be dug out.”
BODY FOUND
In the morning of Sunday, Oct 31, some
three weeks after Huang Na went missing, a team of 20 police officers and
trackers fanned out to search the slope at the Telok Blangah Hill Park. They
were acting on information provided by Took.
After 30 minutes, at 10.30am, officers
came across a box measuring 50cm by 40cm by 30cm in thick vegetation. The box,
which resembled those used at the Pasir Panjang Wholesale Centre, was sealed
with masking tape. Still, a foul smell emanated from it.
Inside was the naked body of a young
girl, forced into a crouching position. It was so decomposed that forensic
tests had to be done before it was confirmed that the body was Huang Na’s. But
the girl was also visually identified by her mother.
Took was arrested for murder and
charged the following day.
The park was just minutes away from
Took’s Telok Blangah flat, and about a 15-minute drive from the wholesale
centre where Huang Na was last seen.
Police also revealed for the first
time that they had uncovered signs of a struggle in a storeroom at the
wholesale centre.
The size of a three-room Housing Board
flat’s living room, it was rented by Took’s boss for storing vegetables and
dried goods. The shutters in the room were always drawn.
Police believed that was where Huang
Na was attacked.
On Nov 5, Took, his hands bound, was
led through the wholesale centre where he was questioned by investigators.
The news that the girl was found dead
left many horrified.
Mr Tan, who had been organising the
search through his website crime-library.org, said as he choked back tears: “I
can’t imagine what that little girl had to go through. How could anyone have
done this?”
On Nov 8, more than a thousand people,
many of them strangers, attended her funeral.
They followed the procession which
went to the West Coast Market, a playground and Jin Tai Primary School – places
which Huang Na frequented.
The lid of her coffin was covered with
her favourite Hello Kitty soft toys, the sides plastered with Hello Kitty
stickers and a Hello Kitty toy hung from each corner of the hearse. Mourners
brought many of her favourite sweets and snacks. She was cremated at Mandai.
 |
|
More than 1,000 people
turned up at Huang Na’s wake in Clementi. Her coffin was decorated with her
favourite Hello Kitty soft toys.PHOTO: ST FILE
|
It was later revealed that Huang Na’s
stepfather, who had flown to Singapore for her funeral, her mother and natural
father all had trouble with the authorities here previously.
Her stepfather Zheng Wenhai was jailed
for two years and four months in 1999. Huang Na’s natural father Huang Qingrong
had also been jailed for working illegally in October 1999, when he was
employed as a vegetable packer at the wholesale centre.
It was the second time Mr Huang had
entered Singapore. In 1996 he had landed a job here, but was sent back in 1997
after it emerged he had lied about having a degree.
In 1999, Madam Huang had also been
repatriated for overstaying her visa. After this revelation, she was put under
investigation again for entering Singapore illegally, but was let off with a
stern warning. By the end of November, she returned to Fujian carrying Huang
Na’s ashes.
 |
|
Took Leng How, a Malaysian-born
man working in Singapore as a vegetable packer who was found guilty in a 2005
trial of the murder of Huang Na, a China-born student, in
2004. His appeal was turned down in January 2006, and a plea of clemency to the
President in October 2006. Took was executed by hanging.
|
THE TRIAL
Took, who was defended by famous
criminal lawyer Subhas Anandan, was put on trial on July 11, 2005.
According to the prosecution’s case,
Took’s colleagues last saw him at 1pm on Oct 10 walking side-by-side with the
girl near the storeroom, with a bag of mangoes in his hand. Several workers
were surprised to see Took hanging around the wholesale centre, as there was
little work on Sundays.
At about 1.40pm, Took coaxed the girl
to play hide-and-seek with him in the storeroom and offered her mangoes to eat.
Remnants of the fruit were later found in her stomach during the autopsy.
Took stripped her, bound her limbs
with raffia string and sexually assaulted her.
To make sure she could not report what
he did to her, Took smothered her. He covered her mouth and nose for at least
two minutes, until her body was limp.
To ensure she was dead, he stamped on
her and kicked her before packing her body inside nine layers of plastic bags.
He then put the bundle in a cardboard box and sealed it with adhesive tape.
It was still daytime, and so too risky
to dispose of the box. So Took rested until 5.30pm at the wholesale centre.
Then he borrowed a motorcycle from a friend who also worked at the centre. He
went home to his Telok Blangah flat and watched TV.
At about 8pm, he returned to the storeroom
to retrieve the box, tied it to the back of the motorcycle and drove up to
Telok Blangah Hill Park, where he dumped it. At 9pm, he returned the motorcycle
to his friend. An hour later, Huang Na’s guardian, Madam Li Xiu Qin, told
police the girl was missing.
“The accused was often Huang Na’s
playmate despite the age difference,” said Deputy Public Prosecutor Lawrence
Ang.
“How was she to know that the person
whom she trusted most among all the people at the Pasir Panjang Wholesale
Centre would soon ravage her and snuff out her life, cruelly and mercilessly?”
Forensic evidence played a big role in
the trial.
Analysis showed that the adhesive tape
used to seal the carton came from the same roll of tape found in the
storeroom.
Part of Took’s fingerprints were also
found on the roll.
The bags used to wrap Huang Na’s body
were found to be similar to ones in the Pasir Panjang shop where Took worked.
Hundreds of cloth fibres from both
Took and Huang Na’s clothes were also found in the storeroom.
The statement Took gave police after
his arrest was also presented as evidence. He claimed that Huang Na knocked her
head while they were playing a “special” game of hide-and-seek in the store
room. It involved him tying her ankles with raffia string with the lights off.
“If she was able to untie herself before I finished counting and switched on
the lights, then she would be the winner,” he said.
But he heard a loud thud and flew into
a panic when he saw Huang Na on the floor having spasms, with her eyes wide
open. Blood was trickling from the corner of her mouth.
He strangled her. Then using his hand,
he “chopped” Huang Na on the back of the neck three times to “put her out of
her misery”. He also stamped on her neck three times. He then stripped her and
molested her with his fingers “so that people will think she was being
raped”.
Next, he used scissors to cut her
clothing to “make it real”. A chilling video of him demonstrating these actions
on a dummy of a child was played in court.
He also told police that he fled to
Malaysia because he feared being hanged.
Took’s colleagues who took the stand
had seen him scolding the girl on several occasions, and said he had even hurt
her at least once.
Took’s employer Kelvin Eng Chow Meng
recalled confronting him after seeing bruises on the girl’s hand back in July
2003.
“The accused claimed that Huang Na was
making too much noise and he was unable to sleep,” he told the court.
Another witness, packer Tan Ban Tiong,
recalled “one or two” occasions when Took tied the girl’s hands with raffia
string to “teach her a lesson not to disturb us”.
 |
|
Huang Na (left) and her killer, Took Leng How
(right)
[PHOTO SOURCE: http://entertainment.toggle.sg/zh/aroundtown/6-5209738]
|
Madam Huang, the murdered girl’s
mother, returned to Singapore to take the stand.
She said she had seen Took lose his
temper and throw things when he was agitated. She recounted an incident in
which she claimed Took had hit Huang Na when they all went on a crab-catching
excursion.
“I told him that if he wanted to play
with a young child, he should not lose his temper. If he was offended, then he
shouldn’t have been playing with her,” she said.
She also told the court she first came
to Singapore in 1999 on a social visit pass to visit her first husband. But
after she found out he was cheating on her, she decided to stay on to look for
a job.
She was jailed for overstaying in
2001, after immigration officers raided the Pasir Panjang shop where she
worked. While she was in prison, she realised she would have problems returning
here to work after she was repatriated to China, as the immigration
authorities had a record of her fingerprints.
But her fellow inmates taught her how
to “beat” the system.
After serving her sentence, she
returned to China and “scarred all my fingers on the right hand and the left
thumb on a hot iron plate”. After the injuries healed, she paid a trafficker
$8,000 to arrange for her and Huang Na to come to Singapore in May 2003.
Shortly after they arrived, they met Took.
 |
|
Took Leng How was the suspect in the murder
of 8 year old Huang Na.
|
DIMINISHED
RESPONSIBILITY
The accused never took the stand in
his defence. Instead, Took relied on the testimony of defence psychiatrist Dr
R. Nagulendran to claim diminished responsibility and escape the noose.
The psychiatrist told the court that
Took’s “irrational” and “inexplicable” strangling of Huang Na, whom he
“considered as a daughter”, and his reactions to her death indicated
schizophrenia. That meant Took could not be fully accountable for his actions.
The accused’s family, he said, also
told him how Took had acted strangely whenever he returned to see them in
Penang. His mother Loo Swee Heow said her son talked about “having spirits in
him” and “often smiled to himself”.
Dr Nagulendran added how Took looked
to mediums for help on two occasions, once in Kulai, Malaysia, and another time
in Geylang.
 |
|
Took Leng How
|
Prosecution psychiatrist G.
Sathyadevan however argued that it was not possible that Took could have been
suffering from delusions and hallucinations, much less schizophrenia, when he
killed Huang Na.
He said: “I
have never seen such a case in my entire years as a psychiatrist where a
patient becomes mentally ill right at the time when the offence is committed.
There are usually disturbances before that.”
Took was not mentally dull either, he
added, even though his IQ of 76 put him just above the mentally retarded
bracket, which is usually considered 70 or below.
In its submissions, the prosecution
also pointed out that he had no history of mental abnormality, and there was
nothing disorganised about the way he went about killing Huang Na.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Ang said: “He had calmly and systematically gone about killing the
deceased. His every action during the killing was pregnant with reason.”
On Aug 26, after a 13-day hearing,
Took was found guilty and sentenced to hang.
Justice Lai Kew Chai noted the
meticulous manner in which Took had planned the disposal of Huang Na’s body and
clothes. He chose a rubbish bin that was not monitored by a camera to dump her
clothes.
He wrapped her in nine plastic bags,
encased her in a box and used the cover of night to dump the body.
“His conduct after the
killing was clearly the product of a cold and calculated mind.”
In January 2006, Took’s appeal was
rejected in a rare split decision. Chief Justice Yong Pung How and Justice Chao
Hick Tin both upheld the conviction, but Justice Kan Ting Chiu dissented.
Forensic pathologist Paul Chui
testified that Huang Na had been smothered to death, most likely by Took
pressing his hand over her mouth and nose, but he also said that signs on Huang
Na’s body — a bruised tongue, vomiting and loss of bowel control — were
consistent with her having a seizure.
While the pathologist told the court
that the seizure was part of the “dying process” and not the primary cause of
death, Justice Kan was not satisfied that there was enough conclusive evidence.
A last ditch appeal to the President
for clemency also failed.
Took was hanged in Changi Prison on
Nov 3, 2006, but not before choosing his own obituary picture after a
photo-taking session in prison, dressed in new clothes brought by his family.
 |
|
Huang Na
|
How it all
unfolded
Oct 13: Police appeal for information
Oct 17: Public put up posters at bus stops
Oct 20: Family friend Took Leng How, 22, disappears; Retired company director Yeo Aik Seng, 60, offers $10,000 reward
Oct 26: Missing person posters are up in Johor Baru; Mr Low Tiam Soon, 48, offers $5,000 as a reward
Oct 29: ComfortDelGro Corporation urges its taxi drivers to be on the lookout for the girl
Oct 30: Took surrenders to police in Penang, returns to Singapore
Oct 31: Police find body of a young girl at Telok Blangah Hill Park
Nov 1: Took is charged with murder
Nov 8: Huang Na is cremated
July 11, 2005:
Took’s trial begins
Aug 26: Took is found guilty and sentenced to hang
January 2006:
His appeal is rejected in a rare split decision by the Court of Appeal
Nov 3: Took is hanged
Read other stories from Guilty As Charged: 25 Crimes That Have Shaken Singapore Since 1965 here.
More Singapore crime stories here.
No comments:
Post a Comment