Bob Evnen received the Rayner
Goddard Act of Courage Award from the comrades of Unit 1012. He favors the
use of the death penalty and is working to retain it in his state.
We have watched him fight for justice and the death penalty in Nebraska
and want him to know that he has encouraged victims' families and leaders
worldwide. We honor and respect him. We hope that more judges and government
officials will follow their courageous character.
Please remember to save
the death penalty in Nebraska by voting repeal (DO NOT vote Retain) to save the
death penalty:
INTERNET SOURCE: http://www.kearneyhub.com/opinions/kearneyview/execution-reserved-for-most-heinous-murderers/article_0d260040-8efc-11e6-a31d-777315b5dfa7.html
Execution
reserved for most heinous murderers
Posted:
Monday, October 10, 2016 10:13 am
Bob Evnen
Nebraska View
A recent
Hub Opinion called the death penalty “wasteful and ineffective.” It is neither.
The death penalty is a just punishment imposed in our state only for the most
heinous crimes committed by the most depraved criminals. We are careful here,
and we impose the death penalty only in the most extreme cases. That’s as it
should be. We should keep the death penalty on the books for those cases.
Opponents
of the death penalty frequently point to costs, but their cost claims are
beyond belief and ignore cost savings. The “study” by Creighton University
economist Ernie Goss doesn’t look like a study at all. It looks like a
four-color glossy promotional piece. That’s not surprising. Goss was paid
$16,000 by an anti-death penalty group to produce it.
Goss claims Nebraska spends an extra
$14.6 million annually on the death penalty. No one in the criminal justice
system confirms Goss’ number. The Legislature’s Fiscal Office said there would
be no cost savings from repealing the death penalty. Goss’ mathematically
produced estimate has no relationship to reality in our state.
The opponents ignore cost savings from
having the death penalty on the books. One recent example occurred in Buffalo
and Hall counties, where a man shot and killed his ex-wife at her home. Next he
drove to Grand Island and shot his former lawyer to death. He was charged with
first degree murder in both cases. The killer agreed to plead guilty to first
degree murder in both counties in exchange for the Hall County attorney’s
agreement not to seek the death penalty. (The death penalty had not been sought
in Buffalo County.)
Because the death penalty was on the
books, the costs of two first degree murder trials, and a number of likely
appeals, were avoided altogether.
Other states have working drug
protocols and our state can, too. Nebraska’s current protocol was selected
because it was the protocol of the federal government. Now it’s the federal
government that is preventing Nebraska from obtaining the drugs. But we can
change our protocol to a process that has worked elsewhere. With strong support
for the death penalty at the polls, we will.
Then there’s the claim that “life
means life.” It doesn’t. Three years ago the Pardons Board commuted the life
sentence of a Nebraska man who had been convicted of first degree murder. He
was promptly paroled. Several months later he was back in prison for sexually
assaulting a 10-year-old girl.
Then, too, some of the people who
piously claim that “life means life” are themselves working to end life
sentences.
There are numerous studies that
demonstrate the deterrent effect of the death penalty, not only when it is
carried out, but when the sentence is issued. Death penalty opponents dislike
these studies because of their clear implication: if we have good reason to
believe that the death penalty deters murder, then it is not just morally permissible,
it is morally compelled, because it saves innocent lives.
Law enforcement overwhelmingly
supports the death penalty. Buffalo County Sheriff Neil Miller recently joined
many of his colleagues from across the state reaffirming his support for the death
penalty. The support of the law enforcement community means a lot. We should
protect those who protect us.
The death penalty is a just
punishment, sparingly applied, as it should be. The voters have exercised their
constitutional right to vote on this serious issue. To keep the death penalty,
vote “Repeal.” Voting to “repeal” the Legislature’s repeal will keep the death
penalty on the books in Nebraska.
No comments:
Post a Comment