'I am 25 and
still afraid of the dark': Victims' families wrestle with grief as they weigh
the death penalty on the ballot
By Jazmine
Ulloa
October 28,
2016
On a cool afternoon in October, Sandra Friend sits
near a patch of green clover outside her small country home near Yuba City,
thinking of her late son as the wind rustles through
the trees. Friend, 43, says she wants “California voters to know what
kind of offenders are on death row,” men like Robert Boyd Rhoades, who sodomized, tortured and killed
8-year-old Michael Lyons two decades ago.
She recalled that investigators said the
wounds her son endured were deliberate: Rhoades stabbed the
63-pound boy 70 to 80 times with a fisherman’s knife and kept him alive
for hours.
“From the very first inflicted wound to Michael, it
was 10 hours to the last one,” Friend said. “For a grown man to inflict that
kind of painful torture on a child — he got the right sentence. He got the only
sentence that would bring any justice.”
As voters consider doing away with the death penalty on Nov. 8,
public opinion of capital punishment has hit a record low and debate has centered on the expensive costs of a broken system. But emotional appeals
like Friend’s have become integral to a campaign that seeks to preserve the
practice, their voices a reminder that justice, closure and vengeance are still
a painful part of the discussion for hundreds of families.
California has the largest death row
population in the country, with more than 740 inmates awaiting punishment
after executions were suspended in 2006, when the state’s method for
lethal injection was challenged in court. Their appeals go directly
to the state Supreme Court and take an average of 25 years.
Friend is among the
supporters of Proposition 66, which intends to speed up the
system. If approved by voters, the proposal would designate trial
courts to take on initial challenges to convictions and require appointed
lawyers who don’t typically take capital appeals to represent death row
inmates. It also would require that the entire appeals process be limited
to within five years of a death sentence.
Opponents of Proposition 66 argue
its provisions could increase the possibility of killing innocent people. They
warn that inexperienced attorneys would have to handle complicated petitions,
and they contend that more cases would fall to lower courts already
struggling with clogged dockets, few lawyers and low funding for investigators
and expert witnesses.
But crime victims, like
Friend, frustrated with what they call an excruciatingly slow appeals
process, say the ballot measure represents a unique opportunity to
fix the system.
“I am not saying I want to
execute someone who is innocent,” Friend said. “I would never want
that, but if one of your loved ones came across Rhoades, it is about justice.”
Michael Lyons
was found near the edge of the Feather River in the Sacramento Valley, his
black Batman shirt pulled over his head, a silver bracelet clutched in his
hand.
He
had always been trusting and eager to help, Friend recalls. He was
the boy who would stay after class to help his teacher clean her classroom. He
was the Casanova who wrote poems to his crushes and picked
flowers for the girls at school.
Friend says
she can’t fault her son for stopping when, on Michael’s way home from
school, Rhoades pulled up next to him and, according to a
neighbor, appeared to ask for directions. But over the past 20 years, she
has committed herself to doing everything in her power to prevent another
parent from going through what she did.
Friend, the mother of five
daughters, has marched up the state Capitol steps to participate
in rallies and testify before lawmakers in support of tougher laws
against sex offenders. As a crime victim counselor and founder of the
Michael Lyons Foundation, she has rushed to the side of other
families and spoken at schools in hopes of giving children the
tools to empower and protect themselves.
Advocating for the death penalty has become part of
that battle.
She
campaigned hard against Proposition 34, an unsuccessful attempt to
end capital punishment in California in November 2012. This year, she
has spoken at media events and has appeared in videos in support of Proposition
66.
Friend said
she had never met Rhoades before he took her son. She now calls him “a monster.”
He had been twice convicted of child molestation and was on parole when he
killed Michael. He was later convicted in the rape and killing of an
18-year-old woman in 1984. Around that time, another woman had alleged
that he attacked her.
“But
no one had believed her,” Friend said. “No
one wanted to believe that this normal looking guy, who goes to work, who
is well off, could turn on you and do horrendous things to you and have no
sympathy for human life.”
The United
States ended its four-year, de facto moratorium on the death
penalty in 1976, when the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed its
constitutionality. California reinstated the practice at the ballot box in
1978.
In the
nearly four decades since, some researchers estimate the state has spent $5 billion on a
system that has housed hundreds of death row inmates and executed only 13, the
latest in 2006.
Now
victims’ family members have become prominent speakers in campaigns for
both death penalty measures. In news conferences held and ads
released for Proposition 66 this week, the promise of closure for loved ones has been among
the dominant themes.
The emotional
appeal, researchers and legal experts said, has become common in recent
decades, as studies have shown that capital punishment is expensive and fails to deter crime. But neither side of the debate,
they argue, has invested enough time or resources to study the real
effect of executions on victims’ families.
Of the
limited research that does exist, studies show a slow death
penalty system can harm families attempting to heal. One of the
most recent analyses, a
2012 report in the Marquette Law Review, found better levels of
physical, psychological, and behavioral health among crime survivors of
adjudicated cases in Minnesota, a life-without-parole state, versus those in
Texas, a death penalty state where cases often became entangled in lengthy
appeals.
Nancy Berns,
a sociology professor at Drake University in Iowa who has written a book on
what she calls the false promise of closure, contends it should be taken
out of the discussion.
“It is not
fair to the victims’ families who can get caught up in this rhetorical
debate when we can’t promise them healing because of an execution,” she said.
For that
reason, some crime victims are choosing instead to support Proposition
62, which would replace capital punishment with life in prison without
parole.
Beth Webb,
who lost her sister and several friends in a 2011 mass shooting at a Seal
Beach hair salon, says more violence does not bring peace.
“Neither me
or my mom will find closure in the death of another human being,” she told a
crowd in June at a Los Angeles press conference.
But former
NFL star Kermit Alexander, one of the most prominent voices behind
Proposition 66, argues that the state should uphold the laws
already in place and send a message to brutal criminals. He is still
waiting for the execution of Tiequon Cox, who killed his mother,
sister and two nephews in South Central Los Angeles in 1984.
“I
find it discouraging that the higher up we go, the worse the
criminals go, there is always a way to forgive them for brutalizing us, and
that is not wholesome,” he said.
Friend’s daughter, Alithya
McDonald, said the debate about the death penalty cannot be void of
emotion or solely about economics when it affects so many families on a
personal level. She argues that it is not the punishment that is the problem,
it is how long she and others must wait to see it carried out.
McDonald was 5 when, wrapped
in Michael’s Spider-Man blanket, she sat on the front steps of her
family’s apartment waiting for her brother to come home. Each one of
her family members died that day in their own way, she said.
In the years that followed, she
often heard her parents cry at night. Her stepfather gave in to
alcoholism. She was rarely, if ever, allowed to go out with her friends.
“I am 25 and still afraid of the
dark,” she said.
Prosecutors told her Rhoades
would be dead by the time she grew up, but he remains on death row at San
Quentin. His face haunts her still.
“If I woke up tomorrow and
Rhoades was no longer breathing on this earth, I would be happy,” she
said.
INTERNET
SOURCE: http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-prop-66-crime-victims-death-penalty-snap-20161028-htmlstory.html
No comments:
Post a Comment