On this date, July 3, 1946, the
codeword Odessa – as known by the Allies – appeared for the first time in a
memo dated July 3, 1946, by the American Counterintelligence Corps (CIC) whose
principal role was to screen displaced persons for possible suspects. The CIC
discovered Odessa at the KZ Bensheim-Auerbach internment camp for the former SS
men who used this watchword in their secret attempts to gain special privileges
from the Red Cross, wrote historian Guy
Walters, but neither the Americans nor the British were able to verify the
claims extending any further than that.
We, the comrades of Unit 1012: The
VFFDP, view them as a horrible organization that helped Nazi War Criminals
escaped to South America and we see them no morally different from the ACLU Demons. We will post information about
Ratlines (World War II Aftermath) from Wikipedia and other links.
Ratlines were a system of escape routes for Nazis
and other fascists
fleeing Europe
at the end of World War II. These escape routes mainly led toward
havens in South America, particularly Argentina, Paraguay, Brazil, Uruguay, Chile, and Bolivia. Other
destinations included the United States, Canada and the Middle
East. There were two primary routes: the first went from Germany to Spain,
then Argentina; the second from Germany to Rome to Genoa, then South
America; the two routes "developed independently" but eventually came
together to collaborate.
Reichsbischof Ludwig
Müller shook hands with Adolf Hitler
[PHOTO
SOURCE: http://randalrauser.com/2014/06/christianity-on-trial-a-review/]
|
Early Spanish ratlines
The origins of the first ratlines are
connected to various developments in Vatican-Argentine relations before and
during World War II. As early as 1942, Monsignor Luigi
Maglione contacted Ambassador Llobet, inquiring as to the "willingness
of the government of the Argentine Republic to apply its immigration law
generously, in order to encourage at the opportune moment European Catholic
immigrants to seek the necessary land and capital in our country".
Afterwards, a German priest, Anton Weber, the head of the Rome-based Society of
Saint Raphael, traveled to Portugal, continuing to Argentina, to lay the groundwork for
future Catholic immigration; this was to be a route which fascist exiles would
exploit - without the knowledge of the Catholic Church. According to historian Michael
Phayer, "this was the innocent origin of what would become the Vatican
ratline".
Spain, not Rome, was the "first
center of ratline activity that facilitated the escape of Nazi fascists",
although the exodus itself was planned within the Vatican. Charles
Lescat, a French member of Action Française (an organization suppressed by Pius XI and
rehabilitated by Pius XII), and Pierre Daye,
a Belgian with contacts in the Spanish government, were among the primary
organizers. Lescat and Daye were the first able to flee Europe, with the help
of Argentine cardinal Antonio Caggiano.
By 1946, there were probably hundreds
of war criminals in Spain, and thousands of former Nazis and fascists.
According to US Secretary of State James
F. Byrnes, Vatican cooperation in turning over asylum-seekers was
"negligible". According to Phayer, Pius XII "preferred to see
fascist war criminals on board ships sailing to the New World rather than
seeing them rotting in POW camps in zonal Germany". Unlike the Vatican
emigration operation in Italy, centered on Vatican
City, the ratlines of Spain, although "fostered by the Vatican"
were relatively independent of the hierarchy of the Vatican Emigration Bureau.
Roman ratlines
Early efforts—Bishop Hudal
Bishop Alois Hudal was rector of the Pontificio
Istituto Teutonico Santa Maria dell'Anima in Rome, a seminary for Austrian and German priests,
and "Spiritual Director of the German People resident in Italy".
After the end of the war in Italy, Hudal became active in ministering to
German-speaking prisoners of war and internees then held in camps
throughout Italy. In December 1944 the Vatican
Secretariat of State received
permission to appoint a representative to "visit the German-speaking civil
internees in Italy", a job assigned to Hudal.
Hudal used this position to aid the
escape of wanted Nazi war criminals, including Franz Stangl, commanding officer of Treblinka, Gustav Wagner, commanding officer of Sobibor, Alois
Brunner, responsible for the Drancy internment camp near Paris and in
charge of deportations in Slovakia to German concentration camps, and Adolf Eichmann— a fact about which he was later
unashamedly open. Some of these wanted men were being held in internment camps:
generally without identity papers, they would be enrolled in camp registers
under false names. Other Nazis were in hiding in Italy, and sought Hudal out as
his role in assisting escapes became known on the Nazi grapevine.:289
In his memoirs Hudal said of his
actions "I thank God that He [allowed me] to visit
and comfort many victims in their prisons and concentration camps and to help
them escape with false identity papers." He explained that in his
eyes:
"The Allies' War against Germany was not a crusade, but the rivalry of economic complexes for whose victory they had been fighting. This so-called business ... used catchwords like democracy, race, religious liberty and Christianity as a bait for the masses. All these experiences were the reason why I felt duty bound after 1945 to devote my whole charitable work mainly to former National Socialists and Fascists, especially to so-called 'war criminals'."
According to Mark
Aarons and John Loftus in their book Unholy Trinity,
Hudal was the first Catholic priest to dedicate himself to establishing escape
routes. Aarons and Loftus claim that Hudal provided the objects of his charity
with money to help them escape, and more importantly with false papers
including identity documents issued by the Vatican Refugee Organisation (Commissione
Pontificia d'Assistenza).
These Vatican papers were not full
passports, and not in themselves enough to gain passage overseas. They were,
rather, the first stop in a paper trail—they could be used to obtain a
displaced person passport from the International Committee of the
Red Cross (ICRC), which in turn could be used to apply for visas. In theory
the ICRC would perform background checks on passport applicants, but in
practice the word of a priest or particularly a bishop would be good enough.
According to statements collected by Gitta
Sereny from a senior official of the Rome branch of the ICRC,:316–17
Hudal could also use his position as a bishop to request papers from the ICRC
"made out according to his specifications". Sereny's sources also
revealed an active illicit trade in stolen and forged ICRC papers in Rome at
this time.
According to declassified US
intelligence reports, Hudal was not the only priest helping Nazi escapees at
this time. In the "La Vista report" declassified in 1984, Counter Intelligence Corps (CIC)
operative Vincent La Vista told how he had easily arranged for two bogus
Hungarian refugees to get false ICRC documents with the help of a letter from a
Father Joseph Gallov. Gallov, who ran a Vatican-sponsored charity for Hungarian
refugees, asked no questions and wrote a letter to his "personal contact
in the International Red Cross, who then issued the passports".
The San Girolamo ratline
According to Aarons and Loftus,
Hudal's private operation was small scale compared to what came later. The
major Roman ratline was operated by a small, but influential network of Croatian
priests, members of the Franciscan order, led by Father Krunoslav Draganović, who organized a highly sophisticated chain with headquarters
at the San Girolamo degli Illirici Seminary
College in Rome, but with links from Austria to the final embarcation point in
the port of Genoa. The ratline initially focused on aiding members of the
Croatian Ustashe
movement, most notably the Croat wartime dictator Ante
Pavelić.
Priests active in the chain included:
Fr. Vilim Cecelja, former Deputy Military Vicar to the Ustashe, based in
Austria where many Ustashe and Nazi refugees remained in hiding; Fr. Dragutin
Kamber, based at San Girolamo; Fr. Dominik Mandić, an official Vatican
representative at San Girolamo and also "General Economist" or
treasurer of the Franciscan order - who used this position to put the
Franciscan press at the ratline's disposal; and Monsignor
Karlo Petranović, based in Genoa. Vilim would make contact with those hiding in
Austria and help them across the border to Italy; Kamber, Mandić and Draganović
would find them lodgings, often in the monastery itself, while they arranged
documentation; finally Draganović would phone Petranović in Genoa with the
number of required berths on ships leaving for South America.
The operation of the Draganović
ratline was an open secret among the intelligence and diplomatic communities in
Rome. As early as
August 1945, Allied commanders in Rome were asking questions about the use of
San Girolamo as a "haven" for Ustashe. A year later, a US State Department report of 12
July 1946 lists nine war criminals, including Albanians
and Montenegrins as well as Croats, plus
others "not actually sheltered in the COLLEGIUM ILLIRICUM [i.e., San
Girolamo degli Illirici] but who otherwise enjoy Church support and
protection." The British envoy to the Holy See, Francis Osborne, asked Domenico
Tardini, a high-ranking Vatican official, for a permission that would have
allowed British military police to raid ex-territorial Vatican Institutions in
Rome. Tardini declined and denied that the church sheltered war criminals.
In February 1947 CIC Special Agent
Robert Clayton Mudd reported ten members of Pavelić's Ustasha cabinet living
either in San Girolamo or in the Vatican itself. Mudd had infiltrated an agent
into the monastery and confirmed that it was "honeycombed with cells of
Ustashe operatives" guarded by "armed youths". Mudd also
reported:
"It was further established that these Croats travel back and forth from the Vatican several times a week in a car with a chauffeur whose license plate bears the two initials CD, "Corpo Diplomatico". It issues forth from the Vatican and discharges its passengers inside the Monastery of San Geronimo. Subject to diplomatic immunity it is impossible to stop the car and discover who are its passengers."
Mudd's conclusion was the following:
"DRAGANOVIC's sponsorship of these Croat Ustashes definitely links him up with the plan of the Vatican to shield these ex-Ustasha nationalists until such time as they are able to procure for them the proper documents to enable them to go to South America. The Vatican, undoubtedly banking on the strong anti-Communist feelings of these men, is endeavoring to infiltrate them into South America in any way possible to counteract the spread of Red doctrine. It has been reliably reported, for example that Dr. VRANCIC has already gone to South America and that Ante PAVELIC and General KREN are scheduled for an early departure to South America through Spain. All these operations are said to have been negotiated by DRAGANOVIC because of his influence in the Vatican."
The existence of Draganović's ratline
has been supported by a highly respected historian of Vatican diplomacy, Fr. Robert
Graham: "I've no doubt that Draganović was
extremely active in syphoning off his Croatian Ustashe friends."
Graham pointed out that Draganović, in running his 'ratline,' was not acting on
behalf of the Vatican: "Just because he's a priest
doesn't mean he represents the Vatican. It was his own operation."
At the same time, there were four occasions in which the Vatican did intervene
on behalf of interned Ustasha prisoners. The Secretariat of State asked the
U.K. and U.S. government to release Croatian POWs from British
internment camps in Italy. The presence of some
pro-Ustashe Croatian clergy at this time is not surprising, but the Vatican itself
officially condemned war crimes committed by the Ustashe, as well as the
Communists.
US intelligence involvement
If at first US intelligence officers
had been mere observers of the Draganović ratline, this changed in the summer
of 1947. A now declassified US Army intelligence report from 1950 sets out in
detail the history of the people smuggling operation in the three years to
follow. According to the report, from this point on US forces themselves had
begun to use Draganović's established network to evacuate its own
"visitors". As the report put it, these were "visitors who had
been in the custody of the 430th CIC and completely processed in accordance
with current directives and requirements, and whose continued residence in
Austria constituted a security threat as well as a source of possible
embarrassment to the Commanding General of USFA, since the Soviet Command had
become aware that their presence in US Zone of Austria and in some instances
had requested the return of these persons to Soviet custody".
These were suspected war criminals
from areas occupied by the Red Army which the US was obliged to hand over for trial
to the Soviets. The US reputedly was reluctant to do so, partly due to a belief
that fair trial could hardly be expected in the USSR (see Operation Keelhaul), and at the same time, their
desire to make use of Nazi scientists and other resources. The deal with
Draganović involved getting the visitors to Rome: "Dragonovich [sic] handled all
phases of the operation after the defectees arrived in Rome, such as the
procurement of IRO Italian and South American documents, visas, stamps,
arrangements for disposition, land or sea, and notification of resettlement
committees in foreign lands". United States intelligence used these
methods in order to get important Nazi scientists and military strategists, to
the extent they had not already been claimed by the Soviet Union, to their own
centres of military science in the US. Many Nazi scientists were employed by
the US, retrieved in Operation Paperclip.
The Red Cross identity
document Adolf Eichmann used to enter Argentine under the fake name Ricardo
Klement in 1950, issued by the Italian delegation of the Red Cross in Genova,
Italy. (14 July 1950)
|
The Argentine Connection
In Nuremberg at that time something was taking place that I personally considered a disgrace and an unfortunate lesson for the future of humanity. I became certain that the Argentine people also considered the Nuremberg process a disgrace, unworthy of the victors, who behaved as if they hadn't been victorious. Now we realize that they [the Allies] deserved to lose the war. (Argentine president Juan Perón on the Nuremberg Trials of Nazi war criminals.)
In his 2002 book The Real Odessa
Argentine researcher Uki Goñi used new access to the country's archives to show
that Argentine diplomats and intelligence officers had, on Perón's
instructions, vigorously encouraged Nazi and Fascist war criminals to make
their home in Argentina. According to Goñi, the Argentines not only
collaborated with Draganović's ratline, they set up further ratlines of their
own running through Scandinavia, Switzerland
and Belgium.
According to Goñi, Argentina's first
move into Nazi smuggling was in January 1946, when Argentine bishop Antonio
Caggiano, bishop of Rosario and leader of the Argentine chapter of Catholic
Action flew with Bishop Agustín Barrére to Rome where Caggiano was due to
be anointed Cardinal. While in Rome the Argentine bishops met with French
Cardinal Eugène Tisserant, where they passed on a message
(recorded in Argentina's diplomatic archives) that "the Government of the
Argentine Republic was willing to receive French persons, whose political attitude during the
recent war would expose them, should they return to France, to harsh measures
and private revenge". Over the spring of 1946 a number of French war
criminals, fascists and Vichy
officials made it from Italy to Argentina in the same way: they were issued
passports by the Rome ICRC office; these were
then stamped with Argentine tourist visas (the need for health certificates and
return tickets was waived on Caggiano's recommendation). The first documented
case of a French war criminal arriving in Buenos Aires was Emile
Dewoitine — later sentenced in absentia to 20 years hard labour. He sailed
first class on the same ship back with Cardinal Caggiano.
Shortly after this Argentinian Nazi
smuggling became institutionalised, according to Goñi, when Perón's new
government of February 1946 appointed anthropologist
Santiago Peralta as Immigration Commissioner and former Ribbentrop agent Ludwig Freude as his intelligence chief. Goñi
argues that these two then set up a "rescue team" of secret service
agents and immigration "advisors", many of whom were themselves
European war-criminals, with Argentine citizenship
and employment.
ODESSA and the Gehlen Org
The Italian and Argentine ratlines
have only been confirmed relatively recently, mainly due to research in newly
declassified archives. Until the work of Aarons and Loftus, and of Uki Goñi
(2002), a common view was that ex-Nazis themselves, organised in secret
networks, ran the escape routes alone. The most famous such network is ODESSA
(Organisation of former SS members), founded in 1946 according to Simon Wiesenthal, which included SS-Obersturmbannführer Otto
Skorzeny and Sturmbannführer Alfred
Naujocks and in Argentina, Rodolfo
Freude. Alois Brunner, former commandant of Drancy internment camp near Paris, escaped
to Rome, then Syria,
by ODESSA. (Brunner was thought to be the highest-ranking Nazi war criminal
still alive as of 2007). Persons claiming to represent ODESSA claimed
responsibility for the 9 July 1979 car bombing in France aimed at Nazi
hunters Serge and Beate Klarsfeld. According to Paul Manning (1980), "eventually,
over 10,000 former German military made it to South America along escape routes
ODESSA and Deutsche Hilfsverein ..."
Simon Wiesenthal, who advised Frederick
Forsyth on the novel/filmscript The
Odessa File which brought the name to public attention, also names
other Nazi escape organisations such as Spinne
("Spider") and Sechsgestirn ("Constellation of
Six"). Wiesenthal describes these immediately after the war as Nazi cells
based in areas of Austria where many Nazis had retreated and gone to ground. Wiesenthal claimed that the
ODESSA network shepherded escapees to the Catholic ratlines in Rome (although
he mentions only Hudal, not Draganović); or through a second route through
France and into Francoist Spain.
ODESSA was supported by the Gehlen
Org, which employed many former Nazi party members, and was headed by Reinhard
Gehlen, a former German Army intelligence officer employed post-war by the CIA. The Gehlen Org
became the nucleus of the BND German intelligence agency, directed by
Reinhard Gehlen from its 1956 creation until 1968.
Ratline escapees
Some of the Nazis and war criminals who escaped
using ratlines include:
- Adolf Eichmann, fled to Argentina in 1950, captured 1960, executed in Israel on 1 June 1962
- Franz Stangl, fled to Brazil in 1951, arrested in 1967 and extradited to West Germany, died in 1971 of natural causes
- Gustav Wagner, fled to Brazil in 1950, arrested 1978, committed suicide 1980
- Erich Priebke, fled to Argentina in 1949, arrested 1994, eventually died in 2013
- Klaus Barbie, fled to Bolivia with help from the United States, captured in 1983, died in prison in France on 23 September 1991
- Eduard Roschmann, escaped to Argentina in 1948, fled to Paraguay to avoid extradition and died there in 1977
- Aribert Heim, disappeared in 1962, most likely died in Egypt in 1992
- Andrija Artuković, escaped to the United States, arrested in 1984 after decades of delay and extradited to Zagreb, Yugoslavia, where died in 1988
- Ante Pavelić, escaped to Argentina in 1948, initially survived an assassination attempt in 1957, but died of his wounds in Spain in 1959
- Walter Rauff, escaped to Chile, never captured, died in 1984
- Alois Brunner, fled to Syria in 1954, died around 2010
- Josef Mengele, fled to Argentina in 1949, then to other countries, dying in Brazil in 1979. Remains exhumed in 1985 and probably destroyed.
- Johann Feil (de)
OTHER LINKS:
The world's oldest terrorist organization is the Roman Catholic church...
ReplyDeleteRatline: the Catholic church did not help the Nazi criminals https://www.uccronline.it/eng/2018/09/12/__trashed/
Delete