Immanuel
Kant on Blood Guilt
[PHOTO
SOURCE: http://www.azquotes.com/quote/1082786]
|
QUOTE: Even if a
civil society were to be dissolved by the consent of all its members (e.g., if
a people inhabiting an island decided to separate and disperse throughout the
world), the last murderer remaining in prison would first have to be executed,
so that each has done to him what his deeds deserve and blood guilt does not
cling to the people for not having insisted upon this punishment; for otherwise
the people can be regarded as collaborators in his public violation of justice. (Kt6:333)
AUTHOR: Immanuel Kant (German
pronunciation: [ɪˈmaːnu̯eːl ˈkant]; 22 April 1724 – 12 February 1804) was a
German philosopher from Königsberg (today Kaliningrad of Russia), researching,
lecturing and writing on philosophy and anthropology at the end of the 18th
Century Enlightenment. At the time, there were major successes and advances in
the sciences (for example, Isaac Newton, Carl Friedrich Gauss, and Robert
Boyle) using reason and logic. But this stood in sharp contrast to the
skepticism and lack of agreement or progress in empiricist philosophy. Kant’s
magnum opus, the Critique of Pure
Reason, aimed to unite reason with experience to move beyond what he
took to be failures of traditional philosophy and metaphysics. He hoped to end
an age of speculation where objects outside experience were used to support
what he saw as futile theories, while opposing the skepticism and idealism of
thinkers such as Descartes, Berkeley and Hume. He said that ‘it always remains
a scandal of philosophy and universal human reason that the existence of things
outside us ... should have to be assumed merely on faith, and that if it occurs
to anyone to doubt it, we should be unable to answer him with a satisfactory
proof’. Kant proposed a ‘Copernican Revolution’, saying that 'Up to now it has
been assumed that all our cognition must conform to the objects; but ...let us
once try whether we do not get farther with the problems of metaphysics by
assuming that the objects must conform to our cognition'. Kant published other
important works on religion, law, aesthetics, astronomy and history. These
included the Critique of Practical
Reason (Kritik der praktischen
Vernunft, 1788), which deals with ethics, and the Critique of Judgment (Kritik der Urteilskraft, 1790), which
looks at aesthetics and teleology. He aimed to resolve disputes between
empirical and rationalist approaches. The former asserted that all knowledge
comes through experience; the latter maintained that reason and innate ideas
were prior. Kant argued that experience is purely subjective without first
being processed by pure reason. He also said that using reason without applying
it to experience will only lead to theoretical illusions. The free and proper
exercise of reason by the individual was both a theme of the Enlightenment, and
of Kant's approaches to the various problems of philosophy. His ideas
influenced many thinkers in Germany during his lifetime. He settled, and moved
philosophy beyond, the debate between the rationalists and empiricists. The
philosophers Fichte, Schelling, Hegel and Schopenhauer amended and developed
the Kantian system, thus bringing about various forms of German idealism. He is
seen as a major figure in the history and development of philosophy. German and
European thinking progressed after his time, and his influence still inspires
philosophical work today.
CHECK THESE TWO PREVIOUS
BLOG POSTS:
1.
IMMANUEL KANT ON THE DEATH PENALTY [ARTICLE ON THE DEATH PENALTY OF THE WEEK
2. IMMANUEL
KANT’S PRO DEATH PENALTY QUOTE [PRO DEATH PENALTY QUOTE]
A slightly different translation:
ReplyDeleteKant: “If he has committed a murder, he must die. In this case, there is no substitute that will satisfy the requirement of legal justice. There is no sameness of kind between death and remaining alive even under the most miserable conditions, and consequently there is no equality between the crime and the retribution unless the criminal is judicially condemned and put to death. But the death of the criminal must be kept entirely free of any maltreatment that would make an abomination of the humanity residing in the person suffering it. Even if a civil society were to dissolve itself by common agreement of all its members (for example, if the people inhabiting an island decided to separate and disperse themselves around the world), the last murderer remaining in prison must first be executed, so that everyone will duly receive what his actions are worth and so that the bloodguilt thereof will not be fixed on the people because they failed to insist on carrying out the punishment; for if they fail to do this, they may be regarded as accomplices in this public violation of legal justice.”
The Metaphysical Elements of Justice (1797), transl. (1965), p. 102; see Rachels, p. 142
https://philosophy.tamucc.edu/people/faculty/sencerz/ethics/extended_examples_capital_punishment