After learning about the Anthony
Porter Case, We, the comrades of Unit 1012, NEVER and DO NOT
support any wrongful conviction, we want the guilty to be punished. However, we
know that the ACLU Demons, uses the word, ‘innocent convicted’
not because they fear convicting the innocent, but they just oppose convicting
the guilty.
On this date, October
30, 2014, Alstory Simon was freed from Prison after spending nearly 15 years
behind bar after being framed by the Innocence Project. We encourage the public
to never believe in those Anti-Death Penalty Activists (Pro Murderers and
murder victims haters) send by Satan anymore, as they enjoy LYING AND LYING SO MUCH!
 |
|
Adolf
Hitler on the Big Lie
[PHOTO
SOURCE: http://www.azquotes.com/quote/133542]
|
INTERNET
SOURCE: http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/illinois-death-penalty-was-abolished-based-on-a-lie/
Illinois Death Penalty was Abolished Based on a Lie
Posted By
Daniel Greenfield On November 11, 2014 @ 9:28 am In The Point | 18
Comments
Earlier
this year I
wrote about the lengths that anti-death penalty activists are willing to go
to fight the death penalty. That included torturing the murderers they claimed
to want to protect.
In 2008, the Supreme Court ruled that lethal injection did not represent cruel and unusual punishment. The question hinged in part on the risk of pain through the procedure. In 2010, the American Board of Anesthesiologists warned it would decertify any anesthesiologist participating in the death penalty. Then the supply of sodium thiopental, the medication mentioned in the ruling, was cut off.The goal was to raise the “substantial risk” of serious pain in lethal injections and move the Supreme Court toward outlawing or suspending the death penalty. The worse an execution went, the more likely it was that future executions would be stopped based on the risk of it happening again. By making lethal injection as messy as possible, the pro-criminal lobby was torturing killers now to save future killers.
Making
the death penalty as painful as possible was one tactic that anti-death penalty
activists used to try and outlaw it. Another involved
straight up framing someone
else for the crime.
Identified by several eye witnesses, Porter was sentenced to death for the fatal shooting of Jerry Hillard and Marilyn Green at a south side Chicago park in 1982. He was just two days from a lethal chemical injection when he was freed in February 1999 following Simon’s confession.Then-Gov. George Ryan imposed a moratorium on the death penalty in 2000, and Illinois abolished capital punishment in 2011.
How was
that confession obtained? You know those nice liberal movies portraying amoral
cops as willing to do anything to frame an innocent black man?
Kind of
like that except the amoral cops were really amoral liberal activists.
Protess and two of his journalism students came to Simon’s home in the 200 block of E. Wright St. in Milwaukee and told him they were working on a book about unsolved murders. According to Simon, Protess told him, “We know you did it.”Then Simon received a visit from Ciolino and another man. They had guns and badges and claimed to be Chicago police officers. They said they knew he had killed Green and Hillard, so he better confess if he hoped to avoid the death penalty.They showed him a video of his ex-wife, Inez Jackson, implicating him for the crime — a claim she recanted on her death bed in 2005 — and another video of a supposed witness to the crime who turned out to be an actor.They coached Simon through a videotaped confession, promising him a light sentence and money from book and movie deals on the case. Simon, admittedly on a three-day crack cocaine bender, struggled to understand what was going on.Perhaps worst of all, they hooked up Simon with a free lawyer to represent him, Jack Rimland, without telling him that Rimland was a friend of Ciolino and Protess and in on their plan to free Porter.At Rimland’s urging, Simon pleaded guilty to the crime and even offered what sounded like a sincere apology to Green’s family in court.
Some
conservatives decided that the Innocence Project was a good thing to be
involved in. This should be a wake-up call. Like everything else, this is
another social change project featuring Ends Justify the Means reasoning that
included framing someone who didn’t do it just to discredit the death penalty.
We know now that the explanation was that Simon was snared in a trap set by people who wanted to end the death penalty, no matter what the cost. Once they convinced Simon it was for his own good, he was all in.
Time for
us to get out and stay out of ventures like this.
OTHER LINKS:
WHAT’S WRONG
WITH THE WRONGFUL CONVICTION MOVEMENT BY MARTIN PREIB
Crime Lab
Report
INNOCENCE
FRAUD PROJECT:
No comments:
Post a Comment