tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408147694441538424.post5187337366639694208..comments2023-11-09T02:13:49.379+08:00Comments on Unit 1012: The Victims' Families For The Death Penalty.: IN LOVING MEMORY OF DANIELLE VAN DAM (DIED ON 2 FEBRUARY 2002)SAINT MICHAEL 2012http://www.blogger.com/profile/16585770692137527425noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408147694441538424.post-20892682581508047432018-07-16T10:58:58.407+08:002018-07-16T10:58:58.407+08:00Her blood was found on his jacket....
Her blood was found on his jacket....<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13485358497284183642noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408147694441538424.post-30567620478342422252016-11-23T05:30:18.123+08:002016-11-23T05:30:18.123+08:00People like you who believe Innocence Project Frau...People like you who believe Innocence Project Fraud and just blindly follow the left wing news are like the stupid cow who chooses his own butchers. <br />Good thing Delbert Tibbs can burn in hell!<br />http://victimsfamiliesforthedeathpenalty.blogspot.com.au/2016/11/innocence-fraud-man-delbert-tibbs-june.htmlSAINT MICHAEL 2012https://www.blogger.com/profile/16585770692137527425noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408147694441538424.post-67023241956392950652016-11-21T21:32:12.526+08:002016-11-21T21:32:12.526+08:00I am not part of the ACLU either. My stand on the ...I am not part of the ACLU either. My stand on the Westerfield case is based on the evidence in that case - which you haven’t disputed.<br /><br />I don’t despise Danielle’s family, I’m just evaluating the evidence.<br /><br />As you have mentioned crime laboratories, the laboratory in the Westerfield case spent days unsuccessfully attempting to prove that the evidentiary orange fibers came from an item of his, but didn’t test the unknown blood on Danielle’s bed, or the unknown hair under her body, or the unknown fingerprints in her house, against national data bases. Foreign DNA in blood on the bed a murder victim was kidnapped from, and the police just ignored it! They were only interested in trying to prove him guilty.<br /><br />What stands out for me in the Wolfe-Petrole case you linked to, is that prosecutors DO commit misconduct, and had it not been for that, Wolfe’s conviction might not have been reversed, in fact the innocence project might not even have taken his case on. Even if prosecutors believe the defendant is guilty, “The ends cannot justify the means when the means are fraudulent.”<br /><br />People who are wrongfully convicted are also victims, as are their families.<br /><br />And convicting the innocent creates “potential public safety threats”, as the guilty felons are free to offend again.Observerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05072720956859703519noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408147694441538424.post-75053324860057014162016-07-27T21:12:38.140+08:002016-07-27T21:12:38.140+08:00Truth is that ACLU Demons like you, side murderers...Truth is that ACLU Demons like you, side murderers and despised the victims' families. You NEVER HAVE A FAMILY MEMBER MURDERED AT ALL.<br /><br />Try telling the 'innocence case of Westerfield to Van Dam's family members (http://victimsfamiliesforthedeathpenalty.blogspot.com.au/2016/07/yes-to-death-penalty-problems-can-be.html)<br /><br />“The ends cannot justify the means when the means are fraudulent.”<br /><br />“The ends cannot justify the means when the means are fraudulent.”<br /><br /> A stern warning was issued to crime laboratory administrators that some post-conviction exonerations may have been secured by innocence activists using malicious tactics, or 'innocence fraud', creating potential public safety threats as convicted felons are released from prison.<br /><br /><br />http://victimsfamiliesforthedeathpenalty.blogspot.com.au/2016/06/vindicated-former-death-row-inmate.htmlSAINT MICHAEL 2012https://www.blogger.com/profile/16585770692137527425noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408147694441538424.post-29345121516124356142016-07-26T22:09:44.645+08:002016-07-26T22:09:44.645+08:00I had to look up the Porter-Simon incident. In 199...I had to look up the Porter-Simon incident. In 1999, the Medill Innocence Project in Illinois succeeded in having Anthony Porter’s 1982 murder conviction overturned, and Alstory Simon was instead convicted of those murders. However, it is now believed that Porter is in fact guilty, and a member of that Innocence Project is accused of wrongdoing.<br /><br />And because of that, you do not believe that David Westerfield was wrongfully convicted in California in 2002. That’s not logical: each case must be considered on its merits. You could equally argue that, because Alstory Simon was wrongfully convicted of Porter’s crimes, therefore you do not believe that Westerfield is guilty.<br /><br />I’m not part of any Innocence Project. Westerfield’s case hasn’t even been taken on by an Innocence Project.Observerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05072720956859703519noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408147694441538424.post-86959323732241077992016-07-21T05:20:11.601+08:002016-07-21T05:20:11.601+08:00Sorry but after learning about the Anthony Porter ...Sorry but after learning about the Anthony Porter and Alstory Simon incident, I DO NOT believe any more of the INNOCENCE PROJECT FRAUD. SAINT MICHAEL 2012https://www.blogger.com/profile/16585770692137527425noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408147694441538424.post-88639558334237381312016-07-20T13:29:18.916+08:002016-07-20T13:29:18.916+08:00Danielle was kidnapped from her bed, but the polic...Danielle was kidnapped from her bed, but the police could find no evidence that Westerfield had ever been in her home - even the police dogs couldn’t detect his scent there. Her body was dumped in a meadow, but there was no evidence that Westerfield had ever been there either - or even knew that this hidden dump site existed.<br /><br />Only a small amount of evidence of Danielle was found in his home and motor home - far less than would be expected if she had been assaulted and killed there. Most of this evidence is easily innocently explained by her cookie sale visit, and the remainder can be innocently explained if she had sneaked into his motor home while it was parked in the streets outside their houses. The fact that the police dogs didn’t detect her scent in either his home or his motor home, is evidence that she hadn’t been there as recently as the weekend she was kidnapped.<br /><br />And the insect evidence indicated that the body was dumped long after Westerfield was under police surveillance, and no evidence was found to explain that large gap in time, so this science excluded him by a wide margin.<br /><br />Some members of law enforcement declared that his computers didn’t contain any child porn. And that was the only evidence offered of motive.<br /><br />Also, although middle-aged, he had no history of sexual or violent crimes.<br /><br />Adding all this together, Westerfield wasn’t - couldn’t have been - the culprit.Observerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05072720956859703519noreply@blogger.com